DEW Knowledge Agent
Turn product materials into a cited multilingual knowledge assistant.
Open ↗DEW AI AGENTS
Not another chatbot demo. We define the role, trusted knowledge, permissions, and acceptance first—so answers cite sources, actions stay approvable, and exceptions escalate to people.
Book a fit callWHAT YOU GET
WHO THIS FITS
Product materials, policies, cases, and SOPs are scattered across people, files, and systems.
Presales, service, and sales teams answer similar questions without turning those answers into reusable capability.
You want AI in real operations but cannot accept unsupported answers, unapproved actions, or opaque workflows.
THE CURRENT GAP
A general model can converse but has no defined responsibility, permissions, inputs, outputs, or acceptance criteria.
Real work contains messy data, exceptions, ambiguity, and high-risk decisions that need people.
Without tests, logs, feedback, cost, and quality review, the agent cannot improve safely.
HOW WE WORK · FDE
DEW works directly with customer business and technical teams to define the problem, connect real data and systems, build the smallest useful production loop, and improve it through adoption and operating feedback.
Enter the real role and workflow to understand users, decisions, knowledge, permissions, and the desired outcome.
Workflow · users · constraintsDefine knowledge, evaluations, tool permissions, approvals, logging boundaries, and the smallest pilot.
Scope · risks · acceptanceBuild a usable agent loop with real anonymized samples, refusal rules, and human escalation.
Working loop · human fallbackConnect the business entry point, test, release, verify permissions, and make escalation explicit.
Release · ownership · exceptionsImprove knowledge and governance from evaluations, approval logs, cost, and business outcomes.
Usage · feedback · improvementACCEPTANCE
Evaluate correctness, citations, field completeness, and refusal behavior on an agreed test set.
Measure task time, human review effort, and the volume the agent can handle consistently.
Verify permissions, approvals, logs, exception handling, and data-use boundaries.
BOUNDARIES
High-risk actions keep human approval by default. Full automation is not the goal by itself.
Sources, refusal, testing, and review manage model limitations instead of hiding them.
Prove one role is valuable before adding more systems, roles, or autonomy.
FAQ
No. A pilot can start with 10–30 high-use documents and real questions while exposing knowledge gaps.
Yes, after confirming APIs, account permissions, approvals, and whether the pilot should read or write.
A well-bounded role with usable materials usually fits a two-to-four-week pilot. Complex integrations are estimated separately.
We combine trusted retrieval, citations, refusal behavior, test-set evaluation, and human review rather than relying on prompting alone.